Writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging a de-novo adjudication order was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.9332 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 18.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD)No.9332 of 2014 and
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014
M/s.V.K.P.K.Arivithurai & Brothers, Partnership Firm Represented by its Partner P.K.Kuttalingam, 1/307, Rajapalayam Main Road, Dhalavaipuram – 628 188, Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu.
... Petitioner
versus
1/5
W.P.(MD)No.9332 of 2014
... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned de-novo adjudication order-in-original No. 04/JC/CE/2009 dated 17.02.2009 of the 4th respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Velmurugan
2/5
W.P.(MD)No.9332 of 2014
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
is closed.
18.10.2023
ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.
To
3/5
W.P.(MD)No.9332 of 2014
Chennai – 600 006.
4/5
W.P.(MD)No.9332 of 2014
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
W.P.(MD)No.9332 of 2014
18.10.2023
5/5
M/s. V.K.P.K. Arivithurai & Brothers
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench
Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli
Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Madurai
Joint Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli
Additional Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli
B. Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
