Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandatory order to sanction a gratuity deposit proposal. The court held the petition was infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.7926 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH
COURT
DATED : 08.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
W.P.(MD)No.7926 of 2018
Palani Arulmigu Dhandayuthapani, Thirukovil retired Employees, Welfare Association, (Regn No. 59/1998) through its Vice President ...Petitioner Vs.
1
W.P(MD)No.7926 of 2018
For Petitioner : Mr.S. Anand Chandrasekar for Saravabhauman Associates For R1 : Mr.P. Subbaraj Special Government Advocate For R2 : Mr. Govindaraj O R D E R
Mr.S.Anand Chandrasekar, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2. The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
4. No costs.
08.09.2023
Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM
2
W.P(MD)No.7926 of 2018
To,
3
W.P(MD)No.7926 of 2018
BATTU DEVANAND, J.
CM
W.P.(MD)No.7926 of 2018
08.09.2023
4
Palani Arulmigu Dhandayuthapani, Thirukovil retired Employees, Welfare Association
Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai
Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Dhandayuthapaniswamy Thirukovil, Palani
Battu Devanand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
