Mumtaj Begam v. the Sub Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the final date of hearing appointed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.7422 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 18.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
W.P.(MD) No.7422 of 2020
Mumtaj Begam ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Sub Registrar, Office of Sub Registrar, Sayalkudi, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondent
Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.03.2020.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader
_________ Page 1 of 3
W.P.(MD) No.7422 of 2020
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 27.03.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted today (18.04.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
18.04.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes cp To The Sub Registrar, Office of Sub Registrar, Sayalkudi, Ramanathapuram District.
Page 2 of 3
W.P.(MD) No.7422 of 2020
P.T.ASHA, J.
cp
W.P.(MD) No.7422 of 2020
Dated: 18.04.2023
_________ Page 3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mumtaj Begam
The Sub Registrar, Office of Sub Registrar, Sayalkudi, Ramanathapuram District
P.T.Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court