Petitioner filed writ petition for injunction against registering sale deed of his property. Petitioner did not appear. Petitioner's counsel did not file written representation. Writ petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.7409 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD)No.7409 of 2016
Xavier Rajini
... Petitioner
versus
... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to forbear from registering any sale deed or any other document regarding the petitioner's property to the extent of 34 cents bounded by (north) remaining land in Survey No.69/3B1, (Sourth)
1/5
W.P.(MD)No.7409 of 2016
Tirunelveli Kadayam Main Road, (East) Edge of the land in Survey No.69/3B2 and (West) land of Manilal Nadar to an extent of 1377 square meters in Survey No.69/3B1 at Mukkoodal Village, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.10.2015.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate
ORDER
The petitioner, claiming to be the owner of the land in Survey
No.69/3B1, to an extent of 34 cents, apprehending that somebody is attempting to sell his land, has filed this writ petition for a Mandamus, forbearing the third respondent from registering any sale deed, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.10.2015.
was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
2/5
W.P.(MD)No.7409 of 2016
instructions received from the Sub-Registrar, Mukkoodal, submits that the petitioner has purchased the said property by way of a document No.552/2015 from one Sundariammal and out of 34 cents, he also sold 5.5 cents to one Anandaraj vide a document No.601/2015 and another
No costs.
23.06.2023
ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.
W.P.(MD)No.7409 of 2016
To
4/5
W.P.(MD)No.7409 of 2016
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
W.P.(MD)No.7409 of 2016
23.06.2023
5/5
Xavier Rajini
The Inspector General of Registration
The District Registrar
Sub-Registrar, Mukkoodal
B.Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
