Dismissed
Kasinathan v. the Superintending Engineer
Madras HCWP(MD)/736/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner, a land purchaser, challenged the denial of an agriculture electricity connection because the vendor substituted the land before the sale. The Court held the petitioner could not benefit from the vendor's prior application.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted liberty to challenge proceedings issued in favour of the fourth respondent for substituting the field.