This equivalent petition sought a writ of mandamus directing the third respondent to reconsider a one-time settlement application. The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence and the Court ruling that it cannot direct officials on contractual disputes.
No direction to consider the one-time settlement application; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.7210 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD)No.7210 of 2016
Jaya
... Petitioner
versus
Chennai – 600 001.
1/4
W.P.(MD)No.7210 of 2016
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to consider one time settlement application on the basis of existing rules and regulations prevailing in the Bank, based on the representation given by the petitioner dated 03.12.2015 on merits and in accordance with law and dispose of the same within a time frame as specified by this Court.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For R2 and R3 : Mr.N.Dilipkumar
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider one time settlement application on the basis of existing rules and regulations prevailing in the Bank, based on his representation dated 03.12.2015.
2/4
W.P.(MD)No.7210 of 2016
there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
respondent to consider the application for one time settlement, no such direction can be granted by this Court on the contractual application. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
22.06.2023
ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
3/4
W.P.(MD)No.7210 of 2016
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
W.P.(MD)No.7210 of 2016
22.06.2023
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court can direct a bank authorities to consider a one-time settlement application based on existing rules?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jaya
B.Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
