Disposed

Sivaranjani .M v. The District Collector

Madras HC22 Jun 2023WP(MD)/6836/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench disposed of this writ petition directing the removal of encroachments, noting that an appeal against the Revenue Divisional Officer's order was pending. Parties were directed to take further steps in tune with the pending appeal's outcome.

What did the court decide?

Parties directed to take further steps in tune with the pending appeal before the District Revenue Officer.

Sivaranjani .M Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.6836 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.06.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.6836 of 2023

¶7

M.Sivaranjani ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai – 615020.

¶10

2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai – 615020.

¶11

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai.

¶12

4.The Tahsildar, Melur – 615 106, Madurai District.

¶13

5.N.Ganesan 6.P.Ammasi .. Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the fourth respondent herein to

¶15

Page 1 of 5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P(MD)No.6836 of 2023

¶18

remove the encroachments made by respondents 5 and 6 in the public pathway in S.No.280/11 to the extent of 0.00.46 ares, 280/12 to the extent of 0.00.38 ares and 280/13 to the extent of 0.00.33 ares in Poonjuthi Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District based on the representation of the petitioner dated 22.02.2023.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manikandan For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Government Pleader For R-5 & R-6 : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan

¶20

ORDER

¶21

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE]

¶22

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶23

The encroachment is alleged on the pathway allegedly committed

¶24

by respondents 5 and 6.

¶25

Learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6, submits that enquiry was

¶26

conducted and the Revenue Divisional Officer passed an order. Against the

¶27

Page 2 of 5

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P(MD)No.6836 of 2023

¶30

Officer.

¶31

same, an appeal is filed and the same is pending before the District Revenue Officer.

¶32

As the appeal is pending before the District Revenue Officer, the parties may take further steps in tune with the judgment that would be delivered by the District Revenue Officer in the pending appeal.

¶33

With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶34

No Costs.

¶35

(S.V.G., CJ.) (R.S.M., J.)

¶36

22.06.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index : Yes/No PM

¶37

Page 3 of 5

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P(MD)No.6836 of 2023

¶40

To:

¶41

1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶42

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi Taluk, Tenkasi District.

¶43

3.The Tahsildar, Tenkasi Taluk, Tenkasi District.

¶44

4.The Village Administrative Officer, Therkadayam, Tenkasi Taluk, Tenkasi.

¶45

Page 4 of 5

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

W.P(MD)No.6836 of 2023

¶48

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

¶49

¶50

W.P.(MD)No.6336 of 2023

¶51

22.06.2023

¶52

Page 5 of 5

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sivaranjani .M v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sivaranjani .M v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.M.Nasar Vs Pandia Rajan K

Dr. Mohans Diabetes Specialities Centre Pvt.Ltd., Vs a.S.Thulasisah

P.Kuppammal Vs S.Subramanian

P. Dinesh Paul Vs the District Educational Officer

Azeez Ahamed Vs The District Collector

Muthuramalingam Vs The Authorized Officer