A writ petition seeking direction to permit the petitioner's daughter to appear for the NEET examination was dismissed because the prescribed period and age limit left nothing for adjudication. The petitioner was absent during the hearing.
Petition dismissed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2017
Minor B.Vanishree Rep. by her father and natural guardian, S.Balakrishnan
... Petitioner
versus
... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first
1/4
W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2017
respondent to take emergent steps to allow petitioner's daughter's NEET exam application.
For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 : Mr.G.Nagarajan For R2 : Mr.C.Nandagopal
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.06.2023, there
was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
09.06.2023
ogy
2/4
W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2017
To
Paithamparai, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District.
3/4
W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2017
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2017
09.06.2023
4/4
Minor B.Vanishree Rep. by her father and natural guardian, S.Balakrishnan
The Chairman, Central Board of Secondary Education
The Chairman (UIDAI)
The Headmaster, The Government Higher Secondary School
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
