Jeevanandam .M v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner submitted a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse an educational loan for his Master's degree studies. The learned counsel for the second and third respondents informed the court that the respondents had taken a decision to disburse the loan as sought by the petitioner in the petition.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P.(MD)No.5978 of 2023
M.Jeevanandam
... Petitioner
vs.
1.The District Collector, Theni District.
2.The Regional Manager, Union Bank, Regional Office, No.581/1, D.B.Road, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore.
3.The Branch Manager, Union Bank, Bodinayakkanur Town, Door No.2, Ponnambalan Street, P.B.No.30. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to forthwith disburse the educational loan to the petitioner to the tune of Rs.2,27,800/- to pursue his first year Master Degree in Logistics and Shipping, first year at ASET College of Science and Technology in Kuthambakkam, Chennai 600 124 and consequently to direct respondents to further grant the educational loan of Rs.2,16,800/- to complete his second year Master Degree in Logistics and Shipping, first
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a direction under Article 226 can be issued to the petitioner to direct the respondents to disburse the educational loan?
Whether the present writ petition seeks any equitable relief that survives adjudication?
Whether the writ petition needs to be adjudicated upon since the issue has been addressed by the respondents?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Jeevanandam
- respondent
The District Collector, Theni District
- respondent
The Regional Manager, Union Bank
- respondent
The Branch Manager, Union Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court