Allowed

Ajmal Khan v. The Regional Passport officer

Madras HC17 Apr 2023WP(MD)/5313/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held that a person solely charged with an offence and not convicted is entitled to a passport. The Court directed the Regional Passport Officer to issue a fresh notice for the petitioner's appearance to examine eligibility and issue the passport within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to issue a fresh notice for the petitioner's appearance and examine eligibility to proceed for issuing the passport within six weeks.

Ajmal Khan Vs The Regional Passport officer — Mining and Natural Resources | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.5313 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 17.04.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.5313 of 2023

Ajmal Khan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Regional Passport Officer Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai - 625 002.

¶11

2.The Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

¶12

3.The Inspector of Police SP Pattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶15

India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue Passport by considering the petitioner Passport Application in

¶16

File No.MD1064803169522 within a time stipulated by this Court on the

¶17

basis of the petitioner's representation dated 09.12.2021.

¶18

1/5

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P(MD)No.5313 of 2023

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Kasinathadurai

¶22

For Respondents : Mr.J.Ashok - for R2 & R3 Additional Government Pleader Mr.R.Nandakumar - for R1

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

The writ petition has been filed in the nature of a Mandamus seeking issuance of passport consequent to application in file No.MD1064803169522 on 25.11.2022. The petitioner, had made the said application. It was informed to him by a letter dated 13.12.2022 by the first respondent that Crime No.206 of 2020 had been registered against him under Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957.

¶25

A counter affidavit had been filed by the third respondent,

¶26

wherein, it had been stated that a final report had been filed before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, but the case is now pending.

¶27

2/5

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P(MD)No.5313 of 2023

¶30

It is stated by the learned Additional Government Pleader that it is now pending before the Special Court at Ramanathapuram District. At any rate, the presumption of innocence runs through the criminal jurisprudence of this Country. The petitioner is only charged with the particular offence. He is not convicted of any offence. He is therefore, entitled for passport.

¶31

A direction is given to the first respondent to issue fresh

¶32

notice to the petitioner herein for appearance and examine if the petitioner is otherwise eligible, proceed to issue passport to the petitioner herein. Such exercise must be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶33

With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶34

17.04.2023

¶35

Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC : Yes / No RM

¶36

3/5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P(MD)No.5313 of 2023

¶39

¶40

1.The Regional Passport Officer Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai - 625 002.

¶41

2.The Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

¶42

3.The Inspector of Police SP Pattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

¶43

4/5

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P(MD)No.5313 of 2023

¶46

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶47

¶48

W.P(MD)No.5313 of 2023

¶49

17.04.2023

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

5/5

Ajmal Khan v. The Regional Passport officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajmal Khan v. The Regional Passport officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Periyakka M Vs the Execution Officer

Jalulinnisha M Vs The District Collector

Farook Abdullah Vs the Deputy Inspector General of Registration

Shanmugam Vs The District Revenue Officer

K.Sekar Vs The District Collector

Navin Rengasamy S Vs The Foreigners Registration Officer