The petitioner challenged a notification requiring her to produce a Solvency Certificate, alleging she produced a false certificate. The Court found no merit in the petition as the notification was acted upon and no further relief was needed.
The Writ Petition is dismissed; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.4776 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 15.12.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.(MD)No.4776 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.3897, 3898 and 3899 of 2021
R.Thilagavathi
... Petitioner
Vs.
Tamil Nadu – 600 028.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his in Na.Kaa. No.6019/Aa1/2020 dated 02.02.2021 and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the second respondent to permit her to produce her Solvency Certificate at the time of scrutiny of her application.
W.P.(MD)No.4776 of 2021
For Petitioner : M/s.T.Karthigai Deeba For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Manikkam, Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the notification issued by
the second respondent in his proceedings Na.Kaa.No.6019/Aa1/2020 dated 02.02.2021 and for a consequential direction to the second respondent to permit the petitioner to produce the Solvency Certificate at the time of scrutiny of her application.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3. In the considered view of this Court, there is no question of interfering with the notification issued by the second respondent. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner instead of producing her Solvency Certificate, had produced the Solvency Certificate of some other person. In order to get over the same, the petitioner has chosen to challenge the very notification itself.
W.P.(MD)No.4776 of 2021
4. This Court does not find any merits in this Writ Petition and in any case this notification has been acted upon and nothing survives in this Writ Petition.
5. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
15.12.2023
NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Nsr
To
W.P.(MD)No.4776 of 2021
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
Nsr
W.P.(MD)No.4776 of 2021
15.12.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should interfere with the notification issued by the respondent requiring production of a Solvency Certificate.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Thilagavathi
The Inspector General of Registration
The District Registrar
N. ANAND VENKATESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
