Disposed

Kalaiselvi.v.a v. The District Collector

Madras HC9 Jan 2023WP(MD)/462/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench entertained a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct survey authorities to survey and demarcate specific lands. The Court issued detailed directions regarding notice issuance, handling of objections, survey timelines, and the installation of survey stones prohibiting fencing during the exercise.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to the survey authority to conduct survey within six weeks, serve notices, handle objections as prescribed, place survey stones only, and forbid fencing.

Kalaiselvi.v.a Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.462 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.01.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.462 of 2023

1.V.A.Kalaiselvi

2.M.Azhagiya Nambi

... Petitioners

Vs.

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Tirunelveli District.

¶12

2.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶13

3.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶14

4.Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Radhapuram Taluk, Tiruenlveli District.

¶15

5.Rajakutty,

¶16

6.M.Kalyani ... Respondents

¶17

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 3 and 4, to survey and demarcate the land in Survey No. 2257/20 to an extent of 2.5

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/6

¶20

W.P(MD)No.462 of 2023

¶21

Cents situated at Valliyoor Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District and fix the boundary by considering the petitioners application, vide payment of Challan dated 26.12.2022 within the time frame stipulated by this Court.

¶22

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Karthick

¶23

For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai, Spl. Government Pleader for R1 to R4.

¶24

ORDER

¶25

The petitioners have applied to the jurisdictional authority for conducting survey of the petition mentioned lands and for demarcation of the boundaries. Since the authority had not acted upon the petitioners' request, this writ petition came to be filed.

¶26

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶27

(I) The survey authority will issue notice to the writ petitioners

¶28

as well as the adjacent land owners and also to the interested persons, if any.

¶29

(II) Enquiry shall be held. During enquiry, objections raised by the adjacent land owners / interested persons shall be considered.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/6

¶32

W.P(MD)No.462 of 2023

¶33

(III) If according to the jurisdictional authority, the objections are without any basis, the same shall be overruled and the objectors shall be informed accordingly. But the survey will be conducted only after a period of six weeks so that the objector can move the concerned Court for injunction. If before the proposed date of survey, the objector is unable to obtain any injunction order, the survey can very well go on. It is open to the parties to serve memo on instructions to the surveyor at the time of conducting the survey. The same will be borne in mind. While it cannot be binding on the surveyor, the same will be taken note of.

¶34

(IV) If the jurisdictional authority finds objections to be having substance, then, he shall call upon the applicant to move the jurisdictional civil Court for agitating his rights.

¶35

(V) If required, the survey authority is empowered to seek aid of the jurisdictional police and the jurisdictional police are mandated to grant police protection.

¶36

(VI) It is made clear that at the end of the survey exercise, survey stones alone can be installed. The exercise of survey and demarcation undertaken pursuant to the direction of this Court can never result in dispossession of any party. No person shall put up

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

3/6

¶39

W.P(MD)No.462 of 2023

¶40

fencing at the time of survey by using police aid. The Survey Authority will pass order within a period of six weeks after service of notice on the interested persons.

¶41

(VII) A copy of the survey report will be served on the parties

¶42

also. No costs.

¶43

09.01.2023 NCS :Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶44

To:

¶45

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Tirunelveli District.

¶46

2.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶47

3.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶48

4.Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Radhapuram Taluk, Tiruenlveli District.

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

4/6

¶51

W.P(MD)No.462 of 2023

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/6

¶53

W.P(MD)No.462 of 2023

¶54

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶55

ias

¶56

W.P(MD)No.462 of 2023

¶57

09.01.2023 (2/2)

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

6/6

Kalaiselvi.v.a v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalaiselvi.v.a v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramar Vs The District Collector

Subhash Vs The District Revenue Officer

Ganesan Vs The District Revenue Officer

Perumal Vs The District Registrar (Administration) (Madurai North)

Santhi Vs The Thasildar

Ariyanendal Village Panchayat Vs The Director