Writ petitioner sought mandamus for police action against individuals interfering in a civil judgment. Court noted representations were already considered and closed, disposing of the petition without further orders.
Petition dismissed as representations were already considered and closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.4473 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
W.P.(MD)No.4473 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD)No.3595 of 2021
A.Kaliammal
... Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondents
1/4
W.P.(MD)No.4473 of 2021
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate legal action against the respondents 4 to 9 for conducting Kattapanchayat and ex-communicating the petitioner and her family from the community by interfering into decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.241/2009 by the learned Additional District Munsif, Sankarankoil, Tenkasi District dated 16.12.2020 and to register the complaint as against the respondents 4 to 9 based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 01.02.2021 and 09.02.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karunanithi For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor
For R4, R6, R7, R9 : Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthick
For R5 & R8 : No Appearance
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to
take appropriate legal action against the respondents 4 to 9 for conducting Kattapanchayat and ex-communicating the petitioner and her family from the community by interfering into decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.241/2009 by the learned Additional District Munsif, 2/4
W.P.(MD)No.4473 of 2021
Sankarankoil, Tenkasi District dated 16.12.2020 and to register the complaint as against the respondents 4 to 9 based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 01.02.2021 and 09.02.2021.
2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the official respondents would contend that already the representation of the petitioner dated 01.02.2021 and 09.02.2021 were considered by the third respondent and the same were closed. The copy of the closure report also produced to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
3.Since the representation of the petitioner was considered and the same was closed, there is no need to pass further orders in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
21.07.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gns
3/4
W.P.(MD)No.4473 of 2021
P. DHANABAL ,J.
gns
To
W.P.(MD)No.4473 of 2021
21.07.2023
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing the police to take action against individuals for interfering in a civil decree and ex-communicating the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Kaliammal
Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Tenkasi District
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sankarankoil
Inspector of Police, Sankarankoil Town Police Station
Lakshmi
Suresh Babu
P. DHANABAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
