K.Dhanasekaran v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The court held that the interim order of March 17, 2023 was complied with by the respondents. Consequently, no further orders were necessary and the writ petition was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.414 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
W.P.(MD) No.414 of 2020
K.Dhanasekaran ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
- 2.The Tahsildar, Mudhukulathur Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
- 3.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai.
4.Q.1272 Semponkudi Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society, Rep.by its President, Sembankudi, Ramanathapuram District-623712. ... Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Dhanasekaran
- respondent
District Collector, Ramanathapuram District
- respondent
Tahsildar, Mudhukulathur Taluk, Ramanathapuram District
- respondent
Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai
- respondent
Q.1272 Semponkudi Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court