Dismissed

Satheeshkumar M v. the District Collector

Madras HC11 Sept 2023WP(MD)/3952/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order in Writ Petition (MD) No. 3952 of 2022 dismisses the matter after recording that a rejection order was passed against the petitioner's representation. The court closed the petition and directed respondents to communicate the order copy to the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

None granted; writ petition closed as no representation was filed by the petitioner.

Satheeshkumar M Vs the District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP(MD)No.3952 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 11.09.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

WP(MD)No.3952 of 2022

¶7

M.Satheesh Kumar ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The District Collector, Madurai District.

¶10

2.The Assistant Director, Rural Developments and Village Panchayats, Madurai Collector Campus, Madurai District.

¶11

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirumangalam Division, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶12

4.The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk Office, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶13

5.The Block Development Officer (BDO), Thirumangalam Block Development Office, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶14

6.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat, Thirumangalam Block Development Office, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶15

1/5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

WP(MD)No.3952 of 2022

7.Muthulakshmi

8.Lakshmanan

9.Karuppiah

... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1^st to 6^th respondents on the basis of the petitioner's dated 18.01.2022 for conducting enquiry against the 7^th and 8^th respondents and to take necessary action to recover the illegally occupied land wherein house built by 9^th respondent in the petitioner's land comprised in S.No.25/3P, New Survey No.88/8 with an extent of 0.00.32 ares (345 Sq.Ft) situated at Virusankulam Village, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District within the period stipulated by this Court.

¶23

For petitioner : No representation For Respondent : Mr.M.Sarangan, Nos.1 to 6 Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : No representation No.9 For Respondent :Mr.V.Balaji No.8

¶24

ORDER

¶25

There is no representation for the petitioner.

¶26

2/5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

WP(MD)No.3952 of 2022

¶29

2.The petitioner has submitted a representation that the 9^th respondent has occupied his land and requested respondents 1 to 6 to take appropriate action.

¶30

3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 submits that the petitioner's representation was considered and orders have been passed rejecting his request vide order dated 28.08.2023.

¶31

4.Recording the above submission, this writ petition is closed. Since there is no representation for the petitioner, the respondents shall communicate the copy of the order to the petitioner forthwith.

¶32

11.09.2023

¶33

Internet : Yes/ No Index : Yes/ No NCC : Yes/ No dsk

¶34

3/5

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

WP(MD)No.3952 of 2022

¶37

¶38

1.The District Collector, Madurai District.

¶39

2.The Assistant Director, Rural Developments and Village Panchayats, Madurai Collector Campus, Madurai District.

¶40

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirumangalam Division, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶41

4.The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk Office, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

¶42

5.The Block Development Officer (BDO), Thirumangalam Block Development Office, Thirumangalam,

¶43

Madurai District.

¶44

6.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat, Thirumangalam Block Development Office, Thirumangalam,

¶45

Madurai District.

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

4/5

¶48

WP(MD)No.3952 of 2022

¶49

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶50

dsk

¶51

WP(MD)No.3952 of 2022

¶52

11.09.2023

¶53

5/5

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Satheeshkumar M v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satheeshkumar M v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kasi Vishvanathan. G Vs The District Collector

Selvakumar .R Vs the Managing Director

Abdul Jappar .S Vs The Secretary to Government

Mariyasesu.M.S Vs the District Collector

Relton Vs The Under Secretary (Psp-I)

Mathuraivalan M Vs the Branch Manager