Disposed

Nagarani v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC27 Feb 2023WP(MD)/3910/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged patta possession, seeking a mandamus for the Revenue Divisional Officer to complete proceedings and the Tahsildar to transfer the patta to the third respondent. The Court directed the Tahsildar to dispose of the petition on merits within four weeks without adjudicating the merits itself, subsequently disposing of the writ.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Tahsildar to dispose of the patta petition on merits within four weeks; disposed of the writ petition.

Nagarani Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.3910 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 27.02.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.3910 of 2023

Nagarani

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶11

Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶12

2.The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶13

3.P.Selvi ... Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to complete the proceeding dated 06.04.2022 and consequently, to direct the second respondent to cancel the patta stands in the petitioner's name and grant the same in the name of the third respondent for the properties in Survey No. 428/3 an extent of 2 Acre 47 Cents in Palayamkottai Village, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District by considering the joint representation of the petitioner and the third respondent dated 06.04.2022 and for other such reliefs within a period stipulated by this Court.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/3

¶17

W.P(MD)No.3910 of 2023

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Manikkam Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶21

The second respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned

¶22

representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the second respondent

¶23

to pass order one way or other. Interested parties shall be put on notice.

¶24

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶25

27.02.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi

¶26

¶27

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶28

2.The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/3

¶31

W.P(MD)No.3910 of 2023

¶32

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶33

rmi

¶34

W.P(MD)No.3910 of 2023

¶35

27.02.2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/3

Nagarani v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagarani v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sevu Meyyammai Atchi Vs the District Collector

Varsha Aqua Packed Drinking Water Vs The Assistant General Manager

Shanmugavelu P Vs the District Collector

Muthukumar. S Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Syed Ibrahim Vs The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu

Abdul Rahman Vs The Regional Passport Officer