A.M. Anand v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ forbidding enforcement of transport permits for sand movement. Court dismissed petition as infructuous due to petitioner's own endorsement.
Petitioner sought writ forbidding enforcement of transport permits for sand movement. Court dismissed petition as infructuous due to petitioner's own endorsement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.3170 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
W.P.(MD) No.3170 of 2010 and
M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2010
A.M.Anand
... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The District Collector Trichy District Trichy
2.The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining Trichy District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from insisting the petitioner and its customers either to obtain transport permits or to get mentioning of the final place of destination in the bills issued by the Public Works Department to transport the processed / filtered sand from the petitioner's stockyards situated in SF No.442/1, 2, New Street, Ayyampalayam, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District and SF No.447/4, 409/5, New Street, Ayyampalayam, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District from his business place at No.68, New Street (A) Ayyampalayam, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District to the place of the petitioner's purchasers' destination.
Page 1 of 4
W.P.(MD) No.3170 of 2010
For Petitioner : Mr.F.Deepak For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the present writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[S.M.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.]
06.10.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
krk
_____________ Page 2 of 4_
W.P.(MD) No.3170 of 2010
To:
Page 3 of 4
W.P.(MD) No.3170 of 2010
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
krk
W.P.(MD) No.3170 of 2010 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2010
06.10.2023
_____________ Page 4 of 4_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.M.Anand
The District Collector Trichy District Trichy
The Assistant Director of Geology and Mining Trichy District
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court