Gnanaraj.S v. the Superintending Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed under Article 226 to quash a notification and permit removal of fly ash was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.295/2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
WP(MD)No.295/2021 & WMP(MD)Nos.226 & 227/2021
S.Gnanaraj
... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the impugned notification in Lr.No.SE/MII/TTPSA/EE/AHP/FAM/F.26/D. 01/21 dated 02.01.21 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to remove the entire quantity of dry fly ash under Agreement dated 04.04.2019 within a period that may be prescribed by this Court.
Page 1 of 3
WP(MD)No.295/2021
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and had also submitted a letter dated 28.03.2023 to the Registry in this regard.
03.04.2023
NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order
mbi
Page 2 of 3
WP(MD)No.295/2021
P.T.ASHA, J.
mbi
WP(MD)No.295/2021
03.04.2023
Page 3 of 3
S.Gnanaraj
The Superintending Engineer, Civil Designs and Hydro Projects, TANGEDCO
The Superintending Engineer/M-II, Tuticorin Thermal Power Station
P.T.Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court