Disposed

Gnanamalar v. The District Revenue Officer

Madras HC7 Dec 2023WP(MD)/28845/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Madras High Court issued a writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of a petition representation on merits within twelve weeks, requiring notice to interested parties before passing a final order.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to dispose the representation on merits within twelve weeks, putting interested persons on notice before passing the final order.

Gnanamalar Vs The District Revenue Officer — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.28845 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 07.12.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.28845 of 2023 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)No.24890 of 2023

¶8

1.Gnanamalar

¶9

2.Mirnalini Devi,

¶10

Rep. through their Power Agent, Rajanayagam.

¶11

... Petitioners

¶12

Vs.

¶13

1.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Office, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶14

2.The Revenue Divisional officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶15

3.S.Aathaan ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to dispose the file in Mu.Mu.P1.2736/99 dated 30.09.1999 in light of observation rendered by 1st respondent in remand

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P(MD)No.28845 of 2023

¶20

order Mu.Mu.P1/25145/2000 dated 28.11.2000 by considering the

¶21

petitioner's representation dated 25.04.2023.

¶22

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Arul Jenifer, For M/s.KBS Law Office.

¶23

For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2.

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶26

2.The second respondent is directed to dispose of the petition

¶27

mentioned representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The second respondent shall put the interested persons, if any, including the third respondent on notice before passing final order. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other.

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P(MD)No.28845 of 2023

¶31

3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶32

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶33

07.12.2023

¶34

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶35

To:-

¶36

1.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Office, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶37

2.The Revenue Divisional officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶38

3/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P(MD)No.28845 of 2023

¶41

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶42

ias

¶43

W.P(MD)No.28845 of 2023

¶44

07.12.2023 (1/2)

¶45

4/4

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Gnanamalar v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gnanamalar v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Udayakumar .S.P Vs Government of India

V.Suresh Kumar Vs The District Collector

Saravanan.S Vs District Revenue Officer

Kamalakannan Vs The District Collector

Sushmitha. J Vs The Registrar

P.Elango Vs The District Collector