Shalini .K v. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed for compensation regarding false implication and wrongful confinement of petitioner's father. Court directed First Respondent to consider representation and pass order disposing of it in light of a prior order within twelve weeks.
What the court decided
W.P(MD)No.26921 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.12.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.26921 of 2023
K.Shalini
... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Additional Chief Secretary, Home Departmental, Secretariat,
- Fort St.George, Chennai.
- 2.State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Principal Secretary, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State of Tamil Nadu is required to pay fair and reasonable compensation for the false implication and wrongful confinement of the petitioner's father in a criminal case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Shalini
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Additional Chief Secretary, Home Departmental, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Principal Secretary, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai
- respondent
The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Thoothukudi District
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court