Disposed

P.Balakrishnan v. The District Registrar (Chit Funds)

Madras HC5 Dec 2023WP(MD)/25585/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus directing the District Registrar to take action under Section 76 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 against the respondent Chit Fund company for alleged violation of the Act.

What did the court decide?

Directing the 1st respondent to hold an enquiry and pass a final order on merits on 2nd respondent within three months.

P.Balakrishnan Vs The District Registrar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.25585 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 05.12.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.25585 of 2023

P.Balakrishnan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Registrar (Chit Funds), The District Registrar Office, Collector Office Post, Dindigul Town, Dindigul District.

¶11

2.Sree Jeyanathan Chit Funds Pvt. Limited, Dindigul Branch, Rep. by its Manager, 121, 122, North Sowrasthirapuram, Nagalnagar, Dindigul – 624 003, Dindigul District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶13

India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the

¶14

1st respondent to take necessary action under Section 76 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 as against the 2nd respondent for conducting Chit Fund

¶15

business in contravention of the provision of the Act by considering the

¶16

representation of the petitioner dated 05.09.2023.

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P(MD)No.25585 of 2023

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Spl. Government Pleader for R1.

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the first respondent.

¶24

2.The petitioner has lodged a complaint before the first respondent for taking action against the second respondent under the relevant provisions of Chit Funds Act, 1982.

¶25

3.The first respondent is directed to hold enquiry and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. All the defences of the second respondent are left open.

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P(MD)No.25585 of 2023

¶29

4.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶30

05.12.2023

¶31

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶32

To:-

¶33

The District Registrar (Chit Funds), The District Registrar Office, Collector Office Post, Dindigul Town, Dindigul District.

¶34

3/4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P(MD)No.25585 of 2023

¶37

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶38

ias

¶39

W.P(MD)No.25585 of 2023

¶40

05.12.2023

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

4/4

P.Balakrishnan v. The District Registrar (Chit Funds)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Balakrishnan v. The District Registrar (Chit Funds)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.India Cements Ltd., Vs the Chairman-Cum-Managing Director

Baluchamy.P Vs The District Collector

Valliammal @ Valliammai (Died) Vs The Regional Deputy Inspector General of Registration

Kumaran .B Vs The District Collector

Jeganatharaja. Sa Vs Senior Divisional Manager

S.Saraswathi Vs The Executive Engineer