Allowed

Karunanidhi. G v. The Management of State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Limited

Madras HC25 Aug 2023WP(MD)/20761/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge bench disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent to pay interest at 6% per annum on the petitioner's belated terminal benefits (EPF, Gratuity, Encashment of Leaves) for the period from 01.07.2022 to 30.05.2023.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to pay interest at 6% per annum on terminal benefits for the period from 01.07.2022 to 30.05.2023 within 12 weeks of the order.

Karunanidhi. G Vs The Management of State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.20761 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 25.08.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.20761 of 2023

G.Karunanidhi

... Petitioner

The Management of State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 2.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay the petitioner interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum, for the period of delay from 01.07.22 to 30.05.23, in paying the amounts paid towards his terminal benefits namely EPF Employees Contribution, Gratuity, Encashment of Leaves, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For Respondent : Mr.K.Senthilkumar Standing Counsel

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

W.P.(MD).No.20761 of 2023

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to pay the petitioner interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum, for the period of delay from 01.07.22 to 30.05.23, in paying the amounts paid towards his terminal benefits namely EPF Employees Contribution, Gratuity, Encashment of Leaves, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶19

By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶20

The petitioner was employed as Driver by the respondent Corporation on 03.04.1991. He retired from service on 30.06.2022.

¶21

It is admitted that his terminal benefits were not settled immediately but only belatedly. The only question that arises for consideration is as regards the rate of interest payable on the belated settlement.

¶22

The issue raised in this writ petition was already decided by this

¶23

Court vide order, dated 07.03.2023 in W.P(MD)No.4866 of 2023 (C.Murugan

¶24

Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., & Another).

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

2/4

¶27

W.P.(MD).No.20761 of 2023

¶28

In view of the above, this Writ Petition stands disposed of by

¶29

directing the respondent Corporation to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for belated settlement of petitioner's terminal benefits namely EPF Employees Contribution, Gratuity, Encashment of Leaves for the period from 01.17.2022 to 30.05.2023. This shall be done within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

25.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PNM

¶31

¶32

The Managing Director, The Management of State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Limited, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 2.

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/4

¶35

W.P.(MD).No.20761 of 2023

¶36

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶37

PNM

¶38

ORDER IN W.P.(MD).No.20761 of 2023

¶39

25.08.2023

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

Karunanidhi. G v. The Management of State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karunanidhi. G v. The Management of State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murugesan.v Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.

Chandra Regi Valse J Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

K.Gopal Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary

D.Victor Samuvel Vs The Management of State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Limited

Muthuraj.a Vs The Management of

Syed Mohideen Ibrahim.S Vs The Management of