Disposed

Lilly.a v. the District Collector

Madras HC11 Oct 2023WP(MD)/2001/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, sought a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to grant an Assignment Patta for land in Survey No. 691/1 by considering a representation dated 17.12.2020 within the time period stipulated by the Court.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to consider the representation dated 17.12.2020 and deal with it on merits within eight weeks.

Lilly.a Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP(MD)No.2001 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.10.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.2001 of 2021

¶7

1.A.Lilly

¶8

2.A.Ebenezer

¶9

3.A.Smitha

¶10

4.A.Anitha 5.A.Vanitha Priya

¶11

...Petitioners

¶12

/Vs./

¶13

1.The District Collector, O/o. District Collectorate, Kanyakumari District.

¶14

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶15

3.The Tahsildar, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District. . ...Respondents

¶16

PRAYER:- Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 to grant Assignment Patta to the Petitioners for the land in Survey No.691/1 to an extent of 1Acre in Kumarapuram Village Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District by considering the representation dated 17.12.2020 within the time period stipulated by this Court.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/4

¶19

WP(MD)No.2001 of 2021

¶20

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan Additional Government Pleader

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioners on 17.12.2020, where the petitioners are seeking for issuance of assignment patta with respect to subject property in Survey No.691/1, Kumarapuram Village, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

¶23

2. Heard Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

¶24

3. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited relief sought for in this writ petition, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioners on 17.12.2020 and deal with the same on merits and in accordance with law and in

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶26

WP(MD)No.2001 of 2021

¶27

the light of the relevant government orders and a final decision shall be taken by the first respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a

¶28

copy of this order and the same shall be conveyed to the petitioners.

¶29

4. This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

¶30

11.10.2023

¶31

NCC : Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sm

¶32

TO:-

¶33

1.The District Collector, O/o. District Collectorate, Kanyakumari District.

¶34

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶35

3.The Tahsildar, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/4

¶38

WP(MD)No.2001 of 2021

¶39

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

¶40

¶41

Order made in W.P.(MD)No.2001 of 2021

¶42

Dated: 11.10.2023

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/4

Lilly.a v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lilly.a v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Safi Mohamed Vs the Secretary

Chidambaram.a Vs the Secretary

Chandra Vs The District Collector

N.Sermadurai Vs the Inspector General of Registration

Amirthavalli.B Vs the Dist. Collector

Ananth.R Vs the Regional Passport Officer