Dismissed
Raja.D v. the Commissioner
Madras HCWP(MD)/19661/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.19661 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 09.10.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.(MD)No.19661 of 2020
D.Raja
...Petitioner
/Vs./
The Commissioner, Dindigul City Municipal Corporation, Dindigul.
. ...Respondent
PRAYER:- Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to issue the License in respect of Collection of Entry Fee at Gandhi Market as per the Tender Process dated 18.03.2020 and as per the Resolution No.1888 dated 19.03.2020 and proceedings issued by the Respondent dated 09.04.2020 for a period of three years commencing from the date of issuance of the license by considering the petitioner's representation dated 27.11.2020 within the time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Arun For Respondent : Mr.J.Lawrance
1/3
WP(MD)No.19661 of 2020
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become
infructuous and that it may be dismissed as such.
become infructuous. No costs.
09.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sm
2/3
WP(MD)No.19661 of 2020
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
sm
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.19661 of 2020
Dated: 09.10.2023
D.Raja
Commissioner, Dindigul City Municipal Corporation
N.Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court