Ganesan .N v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition sought a direction for action against a respondent regarding illegal mining. Maintaining that the act caused civil dispute and penalty was paid, the court closed the petition with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.1936 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD). No.1936 of 2022
N.Ganesan ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
- 2.The Assistant Director, Geology and Mines Department, District Collectorate, Dindigul District.
- 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Division, Dindigul District.
- 4.The Tahsildar, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Ganesan
- respondent
The District Collector, Dindigul District
- respondent
The Assistant Director, Geology and Mines Department
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Division
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Palani Taluk
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court