The petitioner challenged a notice for removal of an unauthorized structure and sought direction to grant plan approval. The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner had not managed to engage counsel and appeared uninterested. Connected petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.18265 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.11.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.P(MD)No.18265 of 2013 and
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013
Jeyabarathi
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner
Karaikudi Municipality,
Karaikudi,
Sivagangai District.
2.The Director
Town and County Planning,
Annasalai,
Chennai.
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ______________
_____________ Page 1 of 5_
W.P(MD)No.18265 of 2013
relating to proceedings in U.A.C.100/2011/F2 dated 01.11.2013 issued by the first respondent and quash the same with a consequential direction to grant plan approval to the building constructed in Sy.No.84, Ward No.3, Block No.47 at Soodamanipuram Village, 100 Feet Road, Kraikudi, Sivagangai District, vide the petitioner's application dated 28.12.2011.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Saravanan
For Respondents : Mr.D.Venkatesh – for R1
Mr.T.Amjad Khan – for R2
Government Advocate
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE]
Heard Mr.D.Saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.D.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the first respondent and Mr.T.Amjad Khan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the second respondent.
01.11.2013 for removal of the unauthorized structure. The petitioner
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 2 of 5_
W.P(MD)No.18265 of 2013
seeks further direction to grant plan approval to the building constructed in Survey No.84, Ward No.3, Block No.47 at Soodamanipuram Village.
engaging another counsel. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[S.V.G., C.J.] [L.V.G., J.] 30.11.2023
Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No RM
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 3 of 5_
W.P(MD)No.18265 of 2013
To
1.The Commissioner Karaikudi Municipality, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.
Town and County Planning,
Annasalai,
Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 4 of 5_
W.P(MD)No.18265 of 2013
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J.
RM
W.P(MD)No.18265 of 2013
30.11.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 5 of 5_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jeyabarathi
The Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality
The Director, Town and County Planning
Sanjay V. Gangapurwala
L. Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
