Sathappa Chindambaram. U v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.1691 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.03.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.1691 of 2023
U.Sathappa Chidambaram ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality, Karaikudi.
2.The Manager, Karaikudi Municipality, Karaikudi.
3.The Revenue Inspector, Karaikudi Municipality, Karaikudi. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to measure and fix vacant site tax for land in T.S.No.363 in Ward No.13, Muthuraman Street, Karaikudi.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Senthil Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.D.Venkatesh Standing Counsel
1/2
W.P(MD)No.1691 of 2023
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmi
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for disposal, the learned standing counsel for Karaikudi Municipality produced the copy of the communication dated 23.01.2023 informing the petitioner that as and when the petitioner produces the relevant document, further action will be taken.
costs.
02.03.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi
W.P(MD)No.1691 of 2023
02.03.2023
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
U.Sathappa Chidambaram
Commissioner, Karaikudi Municipality
Manager, Karaikudi Municipality
Revenue Inspector, Karaikudi Municipality
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court