Dismissed
Chinnakannu v. The Chairman
Madras HCWP(MD)/16734/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Short order dismissing a writ petition seeking retirement benefits as infructuous since the relief had already been granted to the petitioner, with no substantive legal reasoning provided.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(MD)No.16734of 2019
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED: 12.04.2023
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
¶6
W.P.(MD)No.16734 of 2019 and
¶7
W.M.P(MD)No.13339 of 2019
¶8
Chinnakannu ... Petitioner
¶9
Vs.
¶10
- 1.The Chairman, TANGEDCO LTD., Annasalai, Chennai.
¶11
- 2.The Superintending Engineer, Karur Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO LTD., Karur.
¶12
- 3.The Executive Engineer(Rural), Karur Distribution Circle,
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Chinnakannu
- respondent
The Chairman, TANGEDCO LTD.
- respondent
The Superintending Engineer
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court