Dismissed

Booma, D/O.Chinnathambi v. the District Collector

Madras HC5 Sept 2023WP(MD)/1644/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition filed by a former Noon Meal Assistant seeking retirement and pension benefits. The court held that the petitioner was not entitled to benefits as she deserted her service before her retirement date, finding no merit in the claim.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands dismissed as the petitioner is not entitled to any benefits due to desertion of post.

Booma, D/O.Chinnathambi Vs the District… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.1644 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 05.09.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.1644 of 2019

¶7

Booma ... Petitioner

¶8

vs.

¶9

1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 2.The District Educational Officer, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. 3.The Commissioner, Thiruvidaimaruthur Panchayat Union, Thiruvidaimaruthur, Thanjavur District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvidaimaruthur, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give the petitioner's retirement benefits and pension benefits for servicing as Noon Meal Assistant in the Government Middle School, Thirumangalakudi and Maathar Mandram Primary School, Thirumangalakudi, Thiruvidaimaruthur Taluk, Thanjavur District based on the petitioner's representation dated 19.06.2017.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar For Respondents : Mr.J.John Rajadurai Government Advocate for R1, R2 & R4 Mr.M.Jeyakumar for R3

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

W.P.(MD) No.1644 of 2019

¶15

The writ petition is filed for a Mandamus directing the respondents to grant the petitioner's retirement and pension benefit for serving as Noon Meal Assistant in the Government Middle School, Thirumangalakudi and Maathar Mandram Primary School, Thirumangalakudi, Thiruvidaimaruthur Taluk, Thanjavur District based on her representation dated 19.06.2017.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has worked in the post with effect from the year 1989, in which she was appointed upto the year 2004. Therefore, the petitioner should be conferred with the retiral and other benefits which may be due to her.

¶17

The writ petition is resisted by the respondents by filing a counter affidavit. As per paragraph 3 of the counter affidavit it is seen that the petitioner was originally appointed as a Noon Meal Assistant at the Aided Primary School, Thirumangalakudi and joined duty with effect from 01.07.1989. There she developed a difference of opinion with the Noon Meal Organizer pursuant to which, she was stopped from work from 30.09.1995. Thereafter, it seems that she is again appointed as Noon Meal Assistant at the Noon Meal Centre, Panchayat Union Middle School, Thirumangalakudi from

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶19

W.P.(MD) No.1644 of 2019

¶20

04.09.1997. However, when she was working in the said place, she deserted the service from the month of May 2004. Therefore, it can be seen that even before the petitioner could be brought under time scale of pay or being absorbed in any regular post, she deserted her post, eventhough her date of retirement falls only in the year 2014.

¶21

In that view of the matter, the petitioner is not entitled for any of the benefits which is prayed for in the writ petition. Finding no merits, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.

¶22

05.09.2023

¶23

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sji

¶24

¶25

1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶26

2.The District Educational Officer, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶27

3.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvidaimaruthur, Thanjavur District.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶29

W.P.(MD) No.1644 of 2019

¶30

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

¶31

sji

¶32

W.P.(MD) No.1644 of 2019

¶33

05.09.2023

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Booma, D/O.Chinnathambi v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Booma, D/O.Chinnathambi v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Velusamy Vs the State Rep by Its

Rajammal (Deceased) Vs Seetha

M.Sekaran (Died) Vs Palaniammal

Mr.S.Senthil Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Mr.a.Vembudurai Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Mr.M.Murugesan Vs the Government of Tamilnadu