Allowed

Selvam.R v. The District Revenue Officer

Madras HC5 Jan 2023WP(MD)/160/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed a writ petition seeking release of a seized vehicle used for PDS rice transport. The court directed the police to grant interim custody under court-supervised conditions, following Supreme Court precedent on vehicle seizure, while maintaining the right to initiate confiscation proceedings separately.

What did the court decide?

Granted interim custody of the seized vehicle to the petitioner subject to payment of Rs 5000 as court cost, production of ownership documents, and cooperation with enquiries.

Selvam.R Vs The District Revenue Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.160 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 05.01.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.160 of 2023

R.Selvam

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies Crime Investigation Department, Virudhunagar.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to release the TATA 207 Xenon bearing Registration No.TN-09-BY-9672 seized by the second respondent on 15.07.2022 to the petitioner.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Dhandapani

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyananth,

¶16

Addl. Government Pleader for R1. Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R2.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/6

¶19

W.P(MD)No.160 of 2023

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶22

The petition mentioned vehicle was seized in connection with Crime No.135 of 2022 registered on the file of the second respondent.

¶23

The petition mentioned vehicle is presently in the custody of the second respondent. The vehicle is said to have been used for illegally transporting PDS rice.

¶24

It is of course open to the respondent authority to initiate confiscation

¶25

proceedings. In this case we are concerned only with the issue of granting interim custody of the vehicle to the petitioner.

¶26

No purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle under the custody of the respondents. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2002) 10 SCC 283 (Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and Others V. State of Gujarat) has held as follows:-

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/6

¶29

W.P(MD)No.160 of 2023

¶30

“17.In our view, whatever be the situation, it is of no use to keep such seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders immediately by taking appropriate bond and guarantee as well as security for return of the said vehicles, if required at any point of time. This can be done pending hearing of applications for return of such vehicles.

¶31

Therefore, the second respondent is directed to grant interim custody

¶32

of the said vehicle to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-

¶33

a) The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) towards cost in the bank account number of the Principal District Judge, Dharmapurai (Ac No.30345829704, IFSC Code – SBIN0000832, State Bank of India, Dharmapurai Main Branch). It will be a non-refundable payment. The learned Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri is directed to spend the amount now deposited for enhancing the infrastructure of the courts in Dharmapurai District.

¶34

a) The petitioner shall not alienate or encumber the vehicle till the proceedings are completed.

¶35

b) The petitioner shall produce all the documents pertaining to the ownership of the seized vehicle.

¶36

c) As and when the respondents call for the vehicle for enquiry, the petitioner has to produce the vehicle in question and he shall cooperate with the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

3/6

¶39

W.P(MD)No.160 of 2023

¶40

The petitioner's counsel submits that the petitioner's name is not figuring in the R.C.Book, because he is only an agreement holder. The original documents are with the financier. The respondents nevertheless are directed to return the same to the petitioner upon fulfilment of the conditions.

¶41

Upon completion of these formalities, the respondents shall grant interim custody of the vehicle forthwith to the petitioner without any delay. If this undertaking given by the petitioner is breached, the petitioner will not be entitled to interim custody of the vehicle in future. The Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. I make it clear that allowing of this writ petition will not have any bearing on the confiscation proceedings that may be initiated by the authorities. No costs.

¶42

05.01.2023

¶43

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias Issue order copy on 05.01.2023.

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

4/6

¶46

W.P(MD)No.160 of 2023

¶47

To:

¶48

1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

¶49

2.The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies Crime Investigation Department, Virudhunagar.

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

5/6

¶52

W.P(MD)No.160 of 2023

¶53

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶54

ias

¶55

W.P(MD)No.160 of 2023

¶56

05.01.2023

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶58

6/6

Selvam.R v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Selvam.R v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sammandapuram Sri Ramasamy Temple Vs The District Collector

Velmurugan Vs The Tahsildar

V.R.Paramasivam Vs The Tahsildar

Peer Mohammed.a Vs The Thasildar

Abdullah.S Vs The Thasildar

Sivagnanamoorthy Vs The District Revenue Officer