Disposed

K.Ramakrishnan v. the Inspector General of Registration(for Societies)

Madras HC5 Oct 2023WP(MD)/15077/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking mandamus against the non-registration of an association. Holding that action lies with the first respondent if the association is compulsorily registrable, the court dismissed the plea to direct the third respondent to act.

What did the court decide?

Disposed dismissing the impugned prayer against the third respondent, directing the petitioner to approach the first respondent for compulsory registration.

K.Ramakrishnan Vs the Inspector General of Registration(for Societies) — Madras HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.15077 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 05.10.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.15077 of 2020

K.Ramakrishnan

... Petitioner

The Inspector General of Registration (For Societies), No.100 Santhome High Road, Chennai-28. Tamil Nadu, India.

¶11

The District Registrar of Societies, Madurai North, Integrated Complex of Registration Department, TNAU Nagar, Rajakampeeram, Y.Othakadai, Madurai-107.

¶12

The District Registrar of Societies, Madurai South No.171 Palace Road, Madurai-001.

¶13

Tamizhnadu Brahim Association (Thambraas), through its President N.Narayanan

¶14

Flat No.6 First Floor, Vishwakamal, 245 New 62 Rk Mutt Road, Mylapore, Chennai.

¶15

N.Narayanan

¶16

N.Ganapathi Narasimham

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3

¶19

1/5

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P.(MD) No.15077 of 2020

¶22

to take appropriate actions at their respective levels against the above said Thamizhanadu Brahmin Association (THAMBRAAS) Tamil Nadu Piramanar sangam established on 16.11.1980 under Section 46 of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 for the non-registration of the said Association.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.Ramsundar Vijayaraj For M/s.Veera Associates For Respondents : Ms.D.Farzana Goushia Special Government Pleader

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of

¶26

mandamus directing the respondents to initiate action against the 4^th respondent on the ground that the fourth respondent is proceeding to run a society with large number of members and by collecting amounts, even

¶27

without registering the society under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').

¶28

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3.

¶29

3.The learned Special Government Pleader, on instructions

¶30

received from the third respondent, submitted that the 4^th respondent has

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

2/5

¶33

W.P.(MD) No.15077 of 2020

¶34

not registered under the Act within the jurisdiction of the third respondent.

¶35

4.The specific case of the petitioner is that the 4^th respondent

¶36

claims to have been established in the year 1980 and there are large members belonging to the 4^th respondent and the 4^th respondent has been functioning as an association without registering under the Act. In view of the same, the petitioner made a representation/complaint to the respondents 1 to 3 on 10.10.2020. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶37

5.The third respondent in this case cannot take any action, since action can be initiated only if any registration of the society has taken place within the jurisdiction of the third respondent. Admittedly, the 4^th respondent is having their activity throughout Tamilnadu. Therefore, the third respondent cannot initiate any action against the 4^th respondent. If at all the petitioner is aggrieved by the non registration under the Act by the fourth respondent, which is compulsorily registrable association under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act and there is

¶38

3/5

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P.(MD) No.15077 of 2020

¶41

a violation of the same, the representation shall be made to the first respondent and the same shall be considered by the first respondent, after issuing notice to all the interested parties and by affording them an opportunity and thereafter take a decision on merits and in accordance with law.

¶42

The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

05.10.2023

Internet : Yes

The Inspector General of Registration (For Societies), No.100 Santhome High Road, Chennai-28. Tamil Nadu, India.

¶48

The District Registrar of Societies, Madurai North, Integrated Complex of Registration Department, TNAU Nagar, Rajakampeeram, Y.Othakadai,

¶49

Madurai-107.

¶50

The District Registrar of Societies, Madurai South No.171 Palace Road, Madurai-001.

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

4/5

¶53

W.P.(MD) No.15077 of 2020

¶54

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

¶55

¶56

WP. (MD)No.15077 of 2020

¶57

05.10.2023

¶58

5/5

¶59

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.Ramakrishnan v. the Inspector General of Registration(for Societies)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Ramakrishnan v. the Inspector General of Registration(for Societies)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Chinraj Vs the Land Administrative Commissioner

S.P.Vellaichamy Vs The State Rep. by

P. Annakamu Vs the Land Administration Commissioner

Nagaraj Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Kalaivani Vs Union Bank of India

R Marimuthu Vs the Dist.Collector