Dismissed

Mrs.Shakila Hammed, v. the Principal Secretary

Madras HC28 Jun 2023WP(MD)/14958/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 seeking direction to hand over possession of acquired land, the Court observed that the relief sought had become infructuous as conceded by petitioner's counsel and dismissed the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous by recording the submission that the relief sought was no longer available.

Mrs.Shakila Hammed, Vs the Principal Secretary — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.14958 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 28.06.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P(MD) No.14958 of 2013

Mrs.Shakila Hammed

Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Secretariat St.George's Fort, Chennai.

¶11

2.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶12

3.The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶13

4.The Regional Deputy Tahsildar, (Land Acquisition), O/o District Collectorate, Tirunelveli.

¶14

5.The Assistant Executive Engineer, WRO/PWD, Chittar Basin Division, Tenkasi at Courtallam, Tirunelveli District.

¶15

Respondents

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/5

¶18

W.P(MD)No.14958 of 2013

¶19

PRAYER:

¶20

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to pass order in pursuant to the proposal submitted by the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.J2/9830/08, dated 13.08.2010 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.07.2013 and consequently to hand over the possession of the property admeasuring an extent of 3.50 acres comprised in Survey No.1587/1A, Gangaikondan Village, Tirunelveli District to the petitioner within the period stipulated by this Court.

¶21

For Petitioner :Mr.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents :Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus, to direct the

¶24

first respondent to pass an order in pursuant to the proposal submitted by the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.J2/9830/08, dated 13.08.2010 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 06.07.2013 and consequently to hand over the possession of the property to an extent of 3.50 acres comprised in Survey No.1587/1A, Gangaikondan Village, Tirunelveli District to the petitioner within the period stipulated by this Court.

¶25

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P(MD)No.14958 of 2013

¶27

2.Today(28.06.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition has now become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶28

3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel

¶29

for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No

¶30

costs.

¶31

28.06.2023 (½)

¶32

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. vrn

¶33

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P(MD)No.14958 of 2013

¶35

¶36

1.The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Secretariat St.George's Fort, Chennai.

¶37

2.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶38

3.The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶39

4.The Regional Deputy Tahsildar, (Land Acquisition), O/o District Collectorate, Tirunelveli.

¶40

5.The Assistant Executive Engineer, WRO/PWD, Chittar Basin Division, Tenkasi at Courtallam, Tirunelveli District.

¶41

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P(MD)No.14958 of 2013

¶43

B.PUGALENDHI, J

¶44

vrn

¶45

Order made in W.P(MD) No.14958 of 2013

¶46

28.06.2023 (½)

¶47

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mrs.Shakila Hammed, v. the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Shakila Hammed, v. the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohamed Ebunu(Died), Mutharrunnisa, Vs the District Legal Services Authority

P.Gnana Sekhar, Vs the Chairman

T.A.G. Duraipandian Vs the Secretary

Tea Estates India Ltd., Vs the Secretary to Government

Manikandan Vs The Inspector of Police

P.Pandiselvam, Vs Tamilnadu Arasu Cable Tv