Allowed

Annalakshmi v. The Thasildar

Madras HC11 Dec 2023WP(MD)/14577/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition directed the survey authorities to conduct a fresh survey of the petitioner's land. The court held that the previous survey was ineffective due to the lack of a sketch and issued specific procedural directions including notice to adjacent owners, a six-week buffer for injunctions, and prohibition of fencing.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to conduct a fresh survey; issuing notice to neighbors; allowing six-week window for injunction; prohibiting fencing during survey.

Annalakshmi Vs The Thasildar — Specific Performance | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.14577 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.12.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.14577 of 2023

Annalakshmi

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Thasildhar, Usilampatti Taluka, Madurai District.

¶11

2.The Head Surveyor, Usilampatti Taluka, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to survey and measure petitioner's land with regard to property at Survey No.212/3B1B in Karumatthur Revenue Village, Usilampatti Taluka, Madurai District with regard to petitioner's sale deed in Doc.No.547/2011 on the file of the Sub Register, Sekkanoorani by considering petitioner's application in challan number 20230426002670 dated 26.04.2023.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/6

¶15

W.P(MD)No.14577 of 2023

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vignesh

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash, Addl. Government Pleader.

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The petitioner wants to survey to be done in respect of the petition mentioned property on the strength of the sale deed bearing Document No.547/2011 on the file Sub Register, Sekkanoorani.

¶20

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that survey was already done on 19.11.2022 based on village accounts. I wanted the respondents to produce the copy of the survey sketch and survey report. Survey sketch is not forthcoming. Therefore, survey already done is virtually of no use.

¶21

Hence, the respondents are directed to conduct fresh survey.

¶22

3.The Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶23

(I) The survey authority will scrutinize if the application

¶24

2/6

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P(MD)No.14577 of 2023

¶27

submitted by the petitioner is in order.

¶28

(II) The petitioner will have to enclose all the relevant documents such as patta. The applicant must have individual patta in his / her name. If he / she is having joint patta, co-pattadars must given their consent for conducting survey.

¶29

(III) The survey authority will issue notice to the writ petitioner as well as the adjacent land owners and also to the interested persons, if any.

¶30

(IV) Enquiry shall be held. During enquiry, objections raised by the adjacent land owners / interested persons shall be considered.

¶31

(V) If according to the jurisdictional authority, the objections are without any basis, the same shall be overruled and the objectors shall be informed accordingly. But the survey will be conducted only after a period of six weeks so that the objector can move the concerned Court for injunction. If before the proposed date of survey, the objector is unable to obtain any injunction order, the survey can very well go on.

¶32

(VI) It is open to the parties to serve memo of

¶33

3/6

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P(MD)No.14577 of 2023

¶36

instructions to the surveyor at the time of conducting survey. The same will be borne in mind. While it cannot be binding on the surveyor, the same will be taken note of.

¶37

(VII) If the jurisdictional authority finds objections to be having substance, then, he shall call upon the applicant to move the jurisdictional civil Court for agitating his rights.

¶38

(VIII) If required, the survey authority is empowered to seek aid of the jurisdictional police and the jurisdictional police are mandated to grant police protection.

¶39

(IX) It is made clear that at the end of the survey exercise, survey stones alone can be installed. The exercise of survey and demarcation undertaken pursuant to the direction of this Court can never result in dispossession of any party. No person shall put up fencing at the time of survey by using police aid.

¶40

(X) The survey authority will conclude the entire exercise one way or the other within a period of six weeks after service of notice on the interested persons.

¶41

4/6

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

W.P(MD)No.14577 of 2023

¶44

(XI) A copy of the survey report along with sketch will

¶45

be served on the parties. No costs.

¶46

11.12.2023

¶47

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶48

To:-

¶49

1.The Thasildhar, Usilampatti Taluka, Madurai District.

¶50

2.The Head Surveyor, Usilampatti Taluka, Madurai District.

¶51

5/6

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

W.P(MD)No.14577 of 2023

¶54

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶55

ias

¶56

W.P(MD)No.14577 of 2023

¶57

11.12.2023

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

6/6

Annalakshmi v. The Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Annalakshmi v. The Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subramani S Vs The Commissioner

Rajammal Vs The District Registrar

Vaigundam.P Vs The District Collector

Umayal Vs The District Revenue Officer

M/s. Sitco Projects Vs The Sub-Registrar

Anjammal Vs The District Collector