Dismissed

Indra Ganesan College of - v. Union of India

Madras HC11 Jan 2023WP(MD)/1385/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a 2010 Ministry notification. Relying on binding precedents that upheld the challenge to the same notification, the court held the petitioner was not entitled to the sought relief. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed and consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Indra Ganesan College of - Vs Union of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P. (MD) No. 1385 of 2011

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.01.2023

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

W.P. (MD) No. 1385 of 2011

¶7

and

¶8

W.M.P (MD) No. 5032 of 2017. M.P. (MD) Nos. 1 and 2 of 2011

¶9

Indra Ganesan College of Engineering Rep. by its Chairman T.Ganesan

¶10

... Petitioner

¶11

Vs.

¶12

Union of India,

¶13

Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.

¶14

National Highways Authority of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Rep. by its Secretary, G5 & 6, Sector 10, Dwaraka, New Delhi-110 075.

¶15

The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, New No. 6,(Old No. 44) I Floor, 2^nd Main Road, Pon Nagar, Trichy- 620 001. ...Respondents

¶16

1/5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P. (MD) No. 1385 of 2011

¶19

Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1^st respondent made in the notification bearing S.O.NO. 12(E) dated 05.01.2010 issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi and quash the same.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr. B.Prasanna Vinodh For Respondents : Mr. S.Jeyasingh,

¶21

Senior Panel Counsel for R1

¶22

Mr. Arul Vadivel @ Sekar for R2 and R3

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

Heard Mr. B.Prasanna Vinodh, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. S.Jeyasingh, Learned Senior Panel Counsel for the First Respondent and

¶25

Mr. Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, Learned Counsel appearing for the Second and Third Respondents and perused the materials placed on record apart from the pleadings of the parties.

¶26

The Writ Petition challenges the notification dated 05.01.2010 in S.O.No. 12(E) issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.

¶27

2/5

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P. (MD) No. 1385 of 2011

¶30

¶31

It has been brought to notice that challenge to the same notification has been upheld by Order dated 27.02.2014 in W.P. (MD) No. 1890 of 2013 passed by this Court and confirmed by order dated 22.09.2014 in W.A. (MD) No.968 of 2014 by the Division Bench of the Court.

¶32

In view of the aforesaid binding decision, the Petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought in the Writ Petition.

¶33

In fine, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

¶34

11.01.2023

¶35

PKN NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No

¶36

Note: Issue order copy on 30.01.2023.

¶37

¶38

3/5

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P. (MD) No. 1385 of 2011

¶41

Union of India,

¶42

Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.

¶43

National Highways Authority of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Rep. by its Secretary, G5 & 6, Sector 10,

¶44

Dwaraka, New Delhi-110 075.

¶45

The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, New No. 6,(Old No. 44) I Floor, 2^nd Main Road, Pon Nagar, Trichy- 620 001.

¶46

4/5

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

W.P. (MD) No. 1385 of 2011

¶49

P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.

¶50

PKN

¶51

W.P. (MD) No. 1385 of 2011

¶52

11.01.2023

¶53

5/5

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Indra Ganesan College of - v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indra Ganesan College of - v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohamed Educational and Vs Union of India, Rep. by Its

Ravi.P Vs The Licensing Authority

Tvl. Diana Manamagil Mandram Vs The State Tax Officer

M.Chinnadurai, Vs the District Collector

Perumal Konar. N Vs The Commissioner

Veeranan Vs The Regional Transport Officer