Disposed

Santhana Peer Oli.N v. the District Registrar

Madras HC24 Nov 2023WP(MD)/13602/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench held that a writ petition challenging fraudulent registration entries cannot be decided while an appeal is pending before the Deputy Inspector General of Registration. The Court directed the DIG to conduct an enquiry in the pending appeal and pass final orders within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed; direction to Deputy Inspector General to conduct enquiry in pending appeal No.459 of 2021 and pass final orders within eight weeks.

Santhana Peer Oli.N Vs the District… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.10542 and 10543 of 2021

¶7

N.Santhana Peer Oli .. Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The District Registrar, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶10

2.The Sub-Registrar, Uthumalai Sub Registrar Office, Uthumalai, Tenkasi District.

¶11

3.Ibrahim Moosa

¶12

4.M.Abdul Kareem

¶13

5.A.Ramakrishnan

¶14

6.A.Lakshmanan

¶15

7.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli. .. Respondents

¶16

[R7 – suo motu impleaded vide order dated

¶17

24.11.2023 in W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021]

¶18

_________Page 1 of 8

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021

¶21

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 2^nd respondent in connection with the impugned Registration made in Doc. Nos.896/2016 and 897/2016 dated 18.05.2016 and consequently direct him to delete the same as fraudulent and illegal registration and thereby direct the 2^nd respondent to initiate criminal action against the Respondents 3 to 6 in the light of the proceedings of the 1^st respondent in No.343/Aa2/2020 dated 31.10.2020 as well as the order passed by this Court in a similar case in W.P.No.18721 of 2020 dated 15.12.2020 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For RR1, 2 & 7 : Mr.R.Ragavendran Government Advocate For RR3 & 4 : Mr.D.Nallathambi For RR5 & 6 : Mr.R.Ponkarthikeyan

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli is suo motu added as the 7^th respondent in this writ petition.

¶25

_________Page 2 of 8

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021

¶28

Mr.R.Ragavendran, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the impleaded 7^th respondent.

¶29

This writ petition has been filed challenging the registration of two documents in Document Nos.896 and 897 of 2016, dated 18.05.2016 on the file of the 2^nd respondent and for a consequential direction to the 2^nd respondent to delete the entries pertaining to these two documents from the records and to initiate criminal proceedings against respondents 3 to 6, in the light of the proceedings of the 1^st respondent dated 31.10.2020.

¶30

The case of the petitioner is that the respondents 3 and 4 fabricated and created sale deeds and thereby, the subject properties were sold in favour of the 5^th and 6^th respondents through the impugned sale deeds. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner made a complaint before the 1^st respondent. The 1^st respondent, through proceedings dated 31.10.2020, held that the documents are vitiated through fraudulent transaction and directed initiation of criminal proceedings under Section 83 of the Registration Act against the private respondents.

¶31

_________Page 3 of 8

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021

¶34

In the light of the above order passed, the petitioner by relying upon the judgment of this Court in J.Jayaniithaa vs. Inspector General of Registration and others in W.P.No.18721 of 2020 etc., dated 15.12.2020, has filed the present writ petition seeking for various reliefs.

¶35

The 5^th and 6^th respondents, who are the subsequent purchasers have filed a counter affidavit. It is stated that as against the order passed by the 1^st respondent, an appeal has been filed before the Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli and the same is pending in Appeal No.459 of 2021.

¶36

The learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 submitted that a substantive suit has been filed by the 5^th respondent in O.S.No.398 of 2021, which is pending on the file of the Principal Distrit Munsif Court, Tenkasi seeking for the relief of declaration of title and permanent injunction.

¶37

_________Page 4 of 8

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021

¶40

Heard Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, learned counsel for the petitioner,

¶41

Mr.R.Ragavendran, learned Government Advocate for respondents 1, 2 and 7, Mr.D.Nallathambi, learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 and Mr.R.Ponkarthikeyan, learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6.

¶42

In the considered view of this Court, an appeal is now pending before the Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli in Appeal No.459 of 2021, filed against the order passed by the 1^st respondent through proceedings dated 31.10.2020. In view of the same, the relief as sought for in this writ petition cannot be granted at this stage. The parties will have to be heard by the Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli in the pending appeal and subject to the final orders to be passed in the appeal, it would be left open to the parties to work out their remedy.

¶43

In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the impleaded 7^th respondent-Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli to conduct an enquiry in Appeal No.459 of 2021 by affording opportunity

¶44

_________Page 5 of 8

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021

¶47

to the petitioner and respondents 3 to 6. Final orders shall be passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the final orders to be passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli, it is left open to the parties to work out their remedy.

¶48

This Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶49

24.11.2023

¶50

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes

¶51

ABR

¶52

_________Page 6 of 8

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021

¶55

¶56

1.The District Registrar, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

¶57

2.The Sub-Registrar, Uthumalai Sub Registrar Office, Uthumalai, Tenkasi District.

¶58

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Tirunelveli.

¶59

Page 7 of 8

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶61

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021

¶62

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

¶63

ABR

¶64

W.P.(MD) No.13602 of 2021

¶65

Dated : 24.11.2023

¶66

_________Page 8 of 8

¶67

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Santhana Peer Oli.N v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santhana Peer Oli.N v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Therur Thenkumari Inland Fisherman Cooperative Society Ltd. NO.F.N.L-9 Vs the Secretary to Govt

Prema.S Vs Indian Overseas Bank

Alagesh Perumal.G Vs the Dist.Collector

Sivakumar.K.R Vs the Superintendent Engineer

Manjula Vs the District Collector

R. Sankareswari Vs the Superintending Engineer (Distribution)