M.Paramasivam, v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged a notice issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer alleging lack of jurisdiction and irrelevance due to analog-to-digital transition. Counsel withdrew the challenge via endorsement, leading to the closure of the writ petitions without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)Nos.13308 to 13310 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD)Nos.13308 to 13310 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.10371 to 10380 of 2017
W.P.(MD)No.13308 of 2017
M.Paramasivam
... Petitioner
versus
- The Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 'A' Wing Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110 001.
- M/s.Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Revenue Divisional Officer had jurisdiction to issue the impugned notice given the shift from analog to digital distribution of signals.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Paramasivam
- petitioner
M.Paramasivam
- petitioner
Radhakrishnan
- respondent
The Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
- respondent
M/s.Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court