Disposed

T.K. Selvendra Narayanan, v. the Commissioner

Madras HC11 Jan 2023WP(MD)/13067/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a land revenue recovery notice. The Court held that since the petitioners had paid the demanded arrears after the filing of the petition and filed a compliance memo, no further consideration was needed.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed of with observations due to payment of dues; connected Misc. Petition closed; no costs awarded.

T.K. Selvendra Narayanan, Vs the Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P. (MD) No. 13067 of 2012

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.01.2023

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

W.P. (MD) No. 13067 of 2012 and M.P. (MD) No. 2 of 2012

¶7

1.T.K.Selvendra Narayanan 2.T.K.Rajendra Singh ... Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment (Admn), Nungampakkam,

¶10

Chennai – 34.

¶11

2.The Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer, Kanyakumari District Thirukkoilkal, Sucheendram, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to issue a Writ of CERTIORARI, calling for the records relating to R.No. 2926/12/D3 dated 16-08-2012 on the file of the Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer, Kanyakumari District Thirukoilkal, Suchindram, 2nd Respondent herein, quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr. C.Ramanathan

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

For Respondents

¶17

W.P. (MD) No. 13067 of 2012

¶18

: Mr. P.Subbaraj

¶19

Special Government Pleader

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Heard Mr. C.Ramanathan, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. P.Subbaraj, Learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondents

¶22

and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

¶23

The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer, Kanyakumari District Thirukoilkal, Suchindram, 2nd Respondent herein in R.No.2926/12/D3 dated 16.08.2012 seeking to re recover the rented dues from the Petitioner as arrears of land revenue.

¶24

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that a sum of Rs.1,42,147/- as demanded in the impugned notice has been paid on 02.01.2023 and he has filed a memo to that effect, which reads as follows:-

¶25

“ As per the undertaking given by the petitioner dated

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P. (MD) No. 13067 of 2012

¶29

15.12.2022, the petitioner has complied with the undertaking given before this Hon'ble Court by paying the balance arrear amount of Rs.1,42,147/- on 02.01.2023 by Demand Draft in the name of the 2^nd respondent, issued by Indian Overseas Bank, Thazhakudy, vide D.D.No. 465633. In the proof of the same a copy of the Demand Draft is enclosed with.

¶30

Hence, The direction of this Hon'ble Court has been complied with.”

¶31

In such circumstances, nothing remains for further consideration in the Writ Petition, but it would not preclude either of the parties, if they have any other grievance, from working out their remedies before proper forum in the manner recognized by law.

¶32

In fine, the Writ Petition is disposed with the aforesaid observations. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶33

11.01.2023

¶34

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Sm Note: Issue order copy by 30.01.2023.

¶35

P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P. (MD) No. 13067 of 2012

¶39

¶40

TO:

¶41

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment (Admn), Nungampakkam,

¶42

Chennai – 34.

¶43

2.The Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer, Kanyakumari District Thirukkoilkal, Sucheendram, Kanyakumari District.

¶44

W.P. (MD) No. 13067 of 2012

¶45

11.01.2023

¶46

4/4

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

T.K. Selvendra Narayanan, v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.K. Selvendra Narayanan, v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohamed Educational and Vs Union of India, Rep. by Its

Ravi.P Vs The Licensing Authority

Tvl. Diana Manamagil Mandram Vs The State Tax Officer

M.Chinnadurai, Vs the District Collector

Perumal Konar. N Vs The Commissioner

Veeranan Vs The Regional Transport Officer