The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an order rejecting his request to cancel an assignment of surplus land. The court dismissed the petition primarily due to the non-joinder of the assignee as a necessary party.
The Writ Petition was dismissed in view of the non-joinder of the assignee as a necessary party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD).No.13020 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.01.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.P(MD)No.13020 of 2010
V.Sriram Subramanian ..... Petitioner
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceeding in Na.Ka.No.M1/ 6809/2010 (ep.rPh;) dated 13.08.2010 of the first respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader
1/6
W.P(MD).No.13020 of 2010
ORDER
The present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent rejecting the request of the petitioner seeking to cancel the assignment made in favour of the one Esakkimuthu.
the petitioner and Mr.M.Prakash, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2/6
W.P(MD).No.13020 of 2010
3/6
W.P(MD).No.13020 of 2010
4/6
W.P(MD).No.13020 of 2010
I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned communication in
the Writ Petition.
costs.
06.01.2023
NCC: Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi
To
5/6
W.P(MD).No.13020 of 2010
K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
ebsi
Order made in W.P(MD)No.13020 of 2010
06.01.2023
6/6
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the rejection of the request to cancel a land assignment ought to be allowed despite the absence of a condition barring alienation outside the community.
Whether the petitioner failed to implead the necessary party, namely the assignee in whose favour the assignment was sought to be cancelled.
Sriram Subramanian
Director, Land Reforms and Administrative Office, Chepauk, Chennai
Assistant Commissioner, Land Reforms Departments, Chepauk, Chennai
K. Kumaresha Babu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
