Disposed

Chitra P v. The Tahsildar

Madras HC7 Jul 2023WP(MD)/12723/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Tahsildar and Head Surveyor to survey and demarcate his land at Salaigramam Village. The petitioner refused to cooperate with the survey unless present with his Advocate, which the respondent claimed hindered the process. The Court disposed of the petition by directing the s

What the court decided

AI extract

Chitra P Vs The Tahsildar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP(MD)No.12723 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 07.07.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

WP.(MD).No.12723 of 2023

¶7

P.Chitra ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The Tahsildar, Ilayankudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶10

2.The Head Surveyor, Ilayankudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶11

3.The Inspector of Police, Salaigramam Police Station, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to conduct survey and demarcate four boundaries to the property comprised in Sur. No.808/13 situated at Salaigramam Village, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District with the

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

WP(MD)No.12723 of 2023

¶16

aid of the third respondent within a stipulated time period in accordance with law on the basis of the application dated 06.02.2023.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

The petitioner has submitted an application before the first

¶20

respondent for surveying his land in S.No. 808/13 situate at Salaigramam Village, Ilayangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District and has filed this writ petition that the respondents have not conducted the survey.

¶21

2.Today(07.07.2023), when this writ petition is taken up

¶22

for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that whenever the Surveyor went for surveying the petitioner's land, the petitioner has insisted that survey can be conducted only in the presence of the his Advocate and this petitioner is not co-operating for completion of survey.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

WP(MD)No.12723 of 2023

¶26

3.Considering the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to conduct the survey of the petitioner's land on 20.07.2023. The petitioner shall available at the time of survey. No costs.

¶27

07.07.2023

¶28

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. vrn

¶29

¶30

1.The Tahsildar, Ilayankudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶31

2.The Head Surveyor, Ilayankudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶32

3.The Inspector of Police, Salaigramam Police Station, Sivagangai District.

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

WP(MD)No.12723 of 2023

¶36

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶37

vrn

¶38

Order made in WP.(MD).No.12723 of 2023

¶39

07.07.2023

¶40

4/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Chitra P v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Chitra P v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anthonisamy Vs The District Collector

Suriya Narayanan.S Vs The District Collector

Dharani Devi.P Vs The Director

Rajendran Vs The District Registrar

Srinivasan.v Vs The Tanjavur Municipal Corporation

Muthukumar K Vs The Secretary of Tamil Nadu