P.Pandian Nedunchezhian v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed in 2015 seeking relocation of a TASMAC shop adjacent to a temple was closed because the shop had already been shifted by the time of the hearing in 2023.
What the court decided
W.P(MD)No.12432 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.12432 of 2015
P.Pandian Nedunchezhian ... Petitioner
Vs
- 1.The District Collector, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
2.The Regional Manager, Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation (Tasmac) Ltd., Dindigul, Dindigul District.
3.The District Manager, Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation (Tasmac)ltd,, Dindigul, Dindigul District. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to shift the TASMAC wine shop which is situated adjacent to Karuppaswamy temple at the Kodaikanal Road, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District 624 206 to any other place 50
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Pandian Nedunchezhian
- respondent
The District Collector, Dindigul
- respondent
The Regional Manager, Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation
- respondent
The District Manager, Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court