Dismissed

R.Nalini, v. the Director of School

Madras HC7 Jul 2023WP(MD)/12428/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On the petitioners' request to withdraw the writ petitions seeking relief against termination on the grounds of non-passing in the Teachers Eligibility Test, the court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one if adverse consequences ensue.

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file fresh writ petition if adverse consequences arise.

R.Nalini, Vs the Director of School — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)Nos.12428 and 12429 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 07.07.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

W.P(MD)Nos.12428 and 12429 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.9277 and 9278 of 2019

¶7

1.R.Nalini ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.12428 of 2019 2.R.Nathiya ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.12429 of 2019

¶8

vs.

¶9

1.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-6.

¶10

2.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Theni District.

¶11

3.The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Officer, Theni, Theni District.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P(MD)Nos.12428 and 12429 of 2019

¶17

terminate the services of the petitioner for want of pass in Teachers Eligibility Test and not to insist for passing Teacher's Eligibility Test and not to stop the monthly salary of the petitioner in violation of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of Madras High Court in Secretary to the Government Vs. S.Jeyalakshmi reported in 2016 (5) CTC 639 = 2016 (7) MLJ 155.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jayaselan Government Advocate

¶20

ORDER

¶21

These Writ Petitions are filed for a direction not to terminate the services of the petitioners for want of Teachers Eligibility Test.

¶22

2.It is seen that the issue is in respect of the recruitment of Teachers Eligibility Test during the interregnum period, ie., from 23.08.2010 to 29.07.2011.

¶23

However, in these cases, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as of today, the petitioners do not have any grievance as per one of the views taken in the Writ Appeal Nos.313 of 2022 and batch and therefore, he wants to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if at all, they are visited with any adverse consequences.

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P(MD)Nos.12428 and 12429 of 2019

¶27

3.In that view of the prayer and endorsement made, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶28

07.07.2023

¶29

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sji

¶30

Note: Issue order copy on 10.07.2023.

¶31

¶32

1.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-6.

¶33

2.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Theni District.

¶34

3.The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Officer, Theni, Theni District.

¶35

3/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P(MD)Nos.12428 and 12429 of 2019

¶38

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J.

¶39

sji

¶40

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)Nos.12428 and 12429 of 2019

¶41

DATED : 07.07.2023

¶42

4/4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Nalini, v. the Director of School

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Nalini, v. the Director of School

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Santhosh, Vs the Chairman and Managing

Sathiyadoss H.T Vs the Director General of Police

V.Rajendran Vs the Superintending Engineer

V.Ganesh Kumar Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Dr.a.Rajarathinam Vs the Principal Sec. to Govt.

Sounthara Raj, Vs the Government of Tamilnadu