In this writ petition concerning allotment of a shop plot, the High Court held that since the requested plot had already been allotted to a third respondent, no relief could be granted to the petitioner. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.
The writ petition was dismissed as the requested plot had already been allotted to another person.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.11489 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.10.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P(MD)No.11489 of 2014
B.Dhanabalan,
... Petitioner
Vs
Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., Thiru.Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate,
Near SIDCO Electronics Complex,
Guindy, Chennai 32.
M/s Paramakudi Engineering Cluster (Pvt) Ltd.,
No.3/51-H Sidco Industrial Estate, Thelichathanallur Panchayat, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the first respondent's
1/5
W.P(MD)No.11489 of 2014
proceedings in RC No. 4159/1E-1C/2012 dated 01.06.2012 and quash the same in respect of Developed Plot No. 40, SIDCO Industries, Urapuli, Paramakudi Taluk , Ramathapuram District and consequently direct the first respondent to allot the said Developed Plot No. 40 in favour of the petitioner in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sudalayandi For R1 : No appearance For R2 : Mr.T.Sakthi Kumaran For R3 : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan
O R D E R
The petitioner, who is a Hollow Block manufacturer having his unit in Shop No.33 at SIDCO, Urapuli, Paramakudi Taluk with an intention to extend his business has made a request for allotment of shop No.40 in the SIDCO Industries, Urapuli, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramathapuram District and his request was rejected. As against the same, this writ petition was filed by him in the year 2014.
W.P(MD)No.11489 of 2014
2.Today(05.10.2023), when this writ petition is taken up
for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent SIDCO submits that the shop No.40 has already been allotted to the third respondent herein and therefore the petitioner's application cannot be considered.
3.Considering that the shop required by the petitioner has already been allotted to an another person, this writ petition is dismissed as no relief can be granted to this petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
05.10.2023
NCC: Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn
W.P(MD)No.11489 of 2014
To
W.P(MD)No.11489 of 2014
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
vrn
Order made in W.P(MD)No.11489 of 2014
05.10.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to allotment of Developed Plot No.40 when it was already allotted to another person.
B.Dhanabalan
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd.
The Branch Manager, SIDCO Thondi Road
M.Suresh
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
