Dismissed

Kumar a v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC23 Jun 2023WP(MD)/1145/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted the learned counsel's permission for the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions challenging non-inclusion in a promotion panel, resulting in the dismissal of the petitions as withdrawn by consent without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted for withdrawal of writ petitions; petitions dismissed as withdrawn. No costs awarded.

Kumar a Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)Nos.1145 and 1182 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 23.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)Nos.1145 and 1182 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.963, 964, 965, 1034, 1036, 1038, 2110 and 2213 of 2022

¶7

A.Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.1145 of 2022 T.V.Rajarajeshwari ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.1182 of 2022

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶10

2.The Commissioner of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶11

The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶12

4.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o.Chief Educational Officer, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/6

¶15

W.P(MD)Nos.1145 and 1182 of 2022

¶16

5.The District Educational Officer, O/o.The District Educational Officer, CEO Office Campus, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.

¶17

6.The Block Educational Officer - I, O/o.The Block Educational Office, Aranthangi Union, Pudukkottai District.

¶18

The Block Educational Officer - II, O/o.The Block Educational Office, Aranthangi Union, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents 1 to 7 in both W.Ps.

¶19

8.T.Rajathi ... 8^th Respondent in W.P.(MD)No.1145 of 2022 8.P.Saraswathi ... 8^th Respondent in W.P.(MD)No.1145 of 2022

¶20

Common Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating the impugned panel of B.T.Assistant/Tamil Pandits/Elementary School Headmaster fit for promotion to the post of Middle School Head Master Issued by the 6th and 7th respondents in his proceedings Nil dated 28.12.2021 (on the request of the petitioner it was furnished to her by the 4th respondent on 12.01.2022) and quash the same as illegal in so far as the non inclusion of the petitioner's name is concerned and consequentially to direct the respondents 1 to 7 to promote the petitioner as Head Master of the Middle School taking into consideration of the petitioner's seniority in the cadre of B.T.Assistant in terms of second proviso to Section 41(1) of

¶21

2/6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P(MD)Nos.1145 and 1182 of 2022

¶24

Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶25

(In both W.Ps) For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran, For M/s.Ajmal Associates.

¶26

For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar,

¶27

Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R7.

¶28

COMMON ORDER

¶29

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdrawn these writ petitions and also circulated a letter to the Registry to that effect.

¶30

2.Permission granted. These writ petitions are dismissed as

¶31

withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions

¶32

are closed.

¶33

23.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

¶34

3/6

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P(MD)Nos.1145 and 1182 of 2022

¶37

To:-

¶38

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶39

2.The Commissioner of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶40

The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶41

4.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o.Chief Educational Officer, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.

¶42

5.The District Educational Officer, O/o.The District Educational Officer, CEO Office Campus, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.

¶43

6.The Block Educational Officer - I, O/o.The Block Educational Office, Aranthangi Union, Pudukkottai District.

¶44

The Block Educational Officer - II, O/o.The Block Educational Office, Aranthangi Union, Pudukkottai District.

¶45

4/6

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

W.P(MD)Nos.1145 and 1182 of 2022

¶48

5/6

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

W.P(MD)Nos.1145 and 1182 of 2022

¶51

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶52

ias

¶53

W.P(MD)Nos.1145 and 1182 of 2022

¶54

23.06.2023

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

6/6

Kumar a v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar a v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atchaya S Vs the Commissioner / Principal Secretary

Sheela.N Vs The District Collector

Kamala K Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Ashok Kumar M Vs The Director General of Police

Ganesan.R Vs The Director of Khadhi and Village Industries

Chitra .v Vs The State of Tamilnadu