Dismissed

The Area Manager v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Madras HC31 Jan 2023WP(MD)/1128/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Area Manager of Muthoot Fincorp Ltd. seeking to quash government orders related to property attachment. The court held the petition infructuous as the underlying opposition was marshaled and the order was allowed to become absolute.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. The petitioner is at liberty to prefer an appeal challenging the order passed on 10.06.2019.

The Area Manager Vs The Principal Secretary to Government — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.1128 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 31.01.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

W.P(MD)No.1128 of 2023 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1045 and 1047 of 2023

¶8

The Area Manager, Muthoot Fincorp Ltd, No.74, Ground Gloor, Siluvathur Road, Opp.Kamarajar Kalayana Mahal, Near SMB School, Dindigul District. ... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Home (Police XIX) Department, Chennai.

¶11

2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶12

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offence Wing-II, Dindigul. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned order in 1st item in schedule G.O.Ms.No.879, dated 05.12.2016 (HOME (Police XIX) department on the file of the first

¶14

1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P(MD)No.1128 of 2023

¶17

respondent and consequent notices issued by the second respondent in e.f.vz;.No.663/2017/C4, dated 03.07.2019 and the third respondent in e.f.vz;.No.20/fh.J.f/bgh.F.gp.II/jpz;Lf;fy;/2020> dated 10.09.2020 and quash the same as illegal, ultra vires, unconstitutional and unsustainable.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh, For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, Government Advocate, for R1 and R2. : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for R3.

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned order in 1st item in schedule G.O.Ms.No.879, dated 05.12.2016 (HOME (Police XIX) department on the file of the first respondent and consequent notices issued by the second respondent in e.f.vz;.No.663/2017/C4,

¶21

dated 03.07.2019 and the third respondent in e.f.vz;.No. 20/fh.J.f/bgh.F.gp.II/jpz;Lf;fy;/2020> dated 10.09.2020 and quash the same as illegal, ultra vires, unconstitutional and unsustainable.

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P(MD)No.1128 of 2023

¶25

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Civil Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the suit in O.S.No.3 of 2019 in C.C.No.19 of 2019, dated 10.06.2019 on the file of the Special Court under TNPID Act cases, was allowed and the properties attached interimly in G.O.Ms.No. 879/Home Police (XIX) department, dated 05.12.2016, was made absolute.

¶26

3.Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. The petitioner is at liberty to prefer an appeal challenging the order passed on 10.06.2019. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶27

31.01.2023

¶28

NCC : Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das

¶29

3/5

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P(MD)No.1128 of 2023

¶32

¶33

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Home (Police XIX) Department, Chennai.

¶34

2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶35

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offence Wing-II, Dindigul.

¶36

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶37

4/5

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P(MD)No.1128 of 2023

¶40

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J

¶41

das

¶42

Order made in W.P(MD)No.1128 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1045 and 1047 of 2023

¶43

31.01.2023

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

5/5

The Area Manager v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Area Manager v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Kanagaraj Vs The Sub Divisional Magistrate

Balasubramanian Vs The Inspector of Police

Ponraj Vs The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer

Muthusamy Selvam Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Vijaya Doss Vs The Superintendent of Police

Rajamanickam Vs The Inspector of Police