Dismissed

S.P.Udayakumar v. the Joint Secretary (Psp)

Madras HC8 Jun 2023WP(MD)/11132/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this closed order, the Madurai Bench disposed of a writ petition filed by S.P.Udayakumar seeking issuance of a passport under Section 7 of the Passports Act and Article 226 of the Constitution. Closing the petition as the document had already been issued, the Court ordered no costs and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

S.P.Udayakumar Vs the Joint Secretary (Psp) — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP(MD)No.11132 of 2017

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 08.06.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

WP(MD)No.11132 of 2017 and WMP(MD)No.8542 of 2017

S.P.Udayakumar

... Petitioner

1.The Joint Secretary (PSP) & Chief Passport Officer,

¶11

Office of the Joint Secretary (PSP) &

¶12

Chief Passport Officer,

¶13

CPV Division, Patiala House Annexe,

¶14

Tilak Marg, New Delhi- 110 001.

¶15

2.The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Street,

¶16

Race Court Road, Madurai,

¶17

Tamil Nadu – 625 002.

¶18

3.The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bypass Road, Raja Nagar, Tirunelvlei District, Tamil Nadu 627 005. ... Respondents

¶19

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to issue a passport or travel document for a shorter period, as envisaged in proviso of

¶20

1/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

WP(MD)No.11132 of 2017

¶23

Section 7 of the Passports Act, 1967 to enable the petitioner to undertake international travel from 30 June 2017 to 30 September 2017, within a time period stipulated by this Court.

¶24

For petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.KR.Laxman, Standing Counsel

¶25

ORDER

¶26

When this writ petition is taken up for hearing,

¶27

the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that passport has already been issued and nothing survives in this writ petition.

¶28

2.Recording the above submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

08.06.2023

dsk

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

WP(MD)No.11132 of 2017

¶34

¶35

1.The Joint Secretary (PSP) & Chief Passport Officer,

¶36

Office of the Joint Secretary (PSP) & Chief Passport Officer,

¶37

CPV Division, Patiala House Annexe, Tilak Marg, New Delhi- 110 001.

¶38

2.The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Street, Race Court Road, Madurai, Tamil Nadu – 625 002.

¶39

3.The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bypass Road, Raja Nagar, Tirunelvlei District, Tamil Nadu 627 005.

¶40

3/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

WP(MD)No.11132 of 2017

¶43

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶44

dsk

¶45

WP(MD)No.11132 of 2017

¶46

08.06.2023

¶47

4/4

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.P.Udayakumar v. the Joint Secretary (Psp)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.P.Udayakumar v. the Joint Secretary (Psp)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hajima. Ka. Nafiza Beevi, Vs R5..

R.Moorthy, Vs the District Collector

P. Vincent Premkumar, Vs the Executive Engineer

G.Ramdoss Vs Competent Authority

Dr.J.Helen Ratna Monica Vs the Director

Balasubramani Vs the District Collector