Allowed

Perumal v. the Thasildar

Madras HC10 Apr 2023WP(MD)/1079/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court directed the Tahsildar and Surveyor of Dindigul District to survey and demarcate roughly 0.42 ares of the petitioner's landed properties. The court ordered the exercise to be completed within 12 weeks unless objections were legally sustained.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Tahsildar and Surveyor to conduct the survey within 12 weeks, with a duty to provide written reasons if obstructed by objections.

Perumal Vs the Thasildar — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.1079 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED:10.04.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

W.P(MD).No.1079 of 2022

Perumal

... Petitioner

The Tahsildar, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Police Station, Eriyodu, Dindigul District.

¶12

The Surveyor, Eriyodu Firka, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Prayer :Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direct the Respondents No.1 and 3 to Survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's landed properties for an extent of 0.10.53 Ares in S.No.756/2A2 and extent of 0.31.18 Ares in 758/5 (totaling 0.41.75 Ares) at Eriyodu Village Vedasandur

¶15

1/5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P(MD)No.1079 of 2022

¶18

Taluk, Dindigul District, after giving notice to the all person interested in the surrounding of the lands and furnish a copy of the report by considering his representation dated 01.11.2021.

¶19

For Petitioner :Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondents :Mr.N.Muthu Vijayan Special Government Pleader

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The writ petition has been filed in the nature of mandamus, seeking a direction against the first and third respondents/Tahsildar, Vedasandur Taluk and the Surveyor, Eriyodu Firka, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the properties in S.No.756/2A2, measuring an extent of 0.10.53 ares, in S.No.758/5, measuring an extent of 0.31.18 Ares, totally measuring as 0.41.75 Ares at Eriyodu Village Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. The petitioner had given a representation on 01.11.2021 and paid necessary charges.

¶22

2.In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it had been stated that the petitioner was employed in Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. After retirement, he had purchased land in S.No.756/2A2 by a sale deed, dated 20.02.2019. He had also possessed lands in S.No.758/5, patta No.4241. 2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P(MD)No.1079 of 2022

¶25

The petitioner claims that he had given a representation and paid necessary charges for conducting survey.

¶26

3.A direction is given to the first and third respondents/Tahsildar,

¶27

Vedasandur Taluk and the Surveyor, Eriyodu Firka, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District to examine the representation given by the petitioner, proceed to conduct survey the land. If there are any objection, then the first respondent may given reasons in writing for not conducting the survey, or else, conduct survey as per the representation given by the petitioner. The said exercise should be completed within a period of twelve weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

4.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is stands disposed.

¶29

No costs.

¶30

10.04.2023

¶31

NCS :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No PNM

¶32

3/5

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P(MD)No.1079 of 2022

¶35

¶36

The Tahsildar, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶37

The Inspector of Police, Eriyodu Police Station, Eriyodu, Dindigul District.

¶38

The Surveyor, Eriyodu Firka, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶39

4/5

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P(MD)No.1079 of 2022

¶42

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶43

PNM

¶44

ORDER IN W.P(MD).No.1079 of 2022

¶45

10.04.2023

¶46

5/5

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Perumal v. the Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perumal v. the Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Koman.R Vs Periyasamy

Jayarani. M Vs The Regional Passport Officer

Indira M @ Indira Devi Vs The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies

Rani. M Vs The District Collector

Latha.P Vs The Collector

Kannan K Vs The District Collector