Petitioner sought restoration of electricity supply and penalty reduction. Court closed the writ petition noting an earlier order rendered no further adjudication necessary.
The writ petition is closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.10682 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 24.11.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.10682 of 2023
S.Marisamy
... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to restore the Electricity Supply in Service No.05345027718 and reduce the quantum of penalty imposed by the respondents based on his representation dated 15.04.2023.
1/4
W.P(MD)No.10682 of 2023
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susikumar, For M/s.Subash Law Office. For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel.
ORDER
In view of the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.27921 of 2023, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is closed. No costs.
24.11.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias
2/4
W.P(MD)No.10682 of 2023
3/4
W.P(MD)No.10682 of 2023
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
ias
W.P(MD)No.10682 of 2023
24.11.2023
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Marisamy
The Superintendent Engineer (TNEB)
The Assistant Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board
The Executive Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
