K.Kaliappan,S/O.Kaliappa Nadar v. the Sub Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking mandamus to consider a representation regarding wrong encumbrance entries. The court directed the Sub Registrar to consider the representation and take appropriate action within twelve weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to first respondent to consider petitioner's representation and take appropriate action within twelve weeks.
What the court decided
WP(MD)No.10500 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD)No.10500 of 2016
K.Kaliappan
... Petitioner
v.
- 1.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Sethoor, Virudhunagar District.
- 2.The Branch Manager / Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India, Rajapalayam Branch, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 08.02.2016, discharging the title deed which was deposited and reflected in the encumbrance certificate issued on the property in S.No.130/2 at North Devathanam Village, Virudhunagar District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding wrong entries in property records.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Kaliappan
- respondent
The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Sethoor
- respondent
The Branch Manager / Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court