Maniraj.P v. The Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitions under Article 226 challenging DRT decisions on sale certificates and registrations were withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
What did the court decide?
The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs to any party.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD) Nos.10079 & 10080 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 26.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
W.P.(MD) Nos.10079 & 10080 of 2023
P.Maniraj ... Petitioner in both W.Ps.
-vs-
1.The Registrar Debt Recovery Tribunal Madurai 2.The Authorized Officer Indian Bank No.92N, Devarpuram Road Melur Branch Thoothukudi ... Respondents 1 & 2 in both W.Ps. 3.S.Murugananth ... 3rd Respondent in W.P.(MD) No.10079 of 2023 4.R.Rajan ... 3rd Respondent in W.P.(MD) No.10080 of 2023
____________ Page 1 of 4
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant a writ of mandamus directing the DRT to main number applications to set aside sale certificates and consequent registrations decided on merits.
Whether to accord directions on the disposal of the impugned orders within a stipulated time.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Maniraj
- respondent
The Registrar Debt Recovery Tribunal Madurai
- respondent
The Authorized Officer Indian Bank No.92N, Devarpuram Road Melur Branch Thoothukudi
- respondent
S.Murugananth
- respondent
R.Rajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court