Disposed

Madhumathi v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC19 Jan 2023WP/964/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a mandate directing the Tahsildar to transfer Patta No.2207 in her favor and that of other heirs of her late husband, Aranganathan. The Court directed the respondents to consider the representation and pass orders on merits within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the representation and pass orders on merits within eight weeks.

Madhumathi Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.964 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 19.01.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

W.P.No.964 of 2023

Madhumathi

... Petitioner

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi.

¶11

2.The Tahsildar, Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent to transfer patta No.2207 on the file of the 2^nd respondent in favour of the petitioner and other legal heirs of her late husband namely Aranganathan in pursuance of petitioner's representation dated 28.11.2022.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.A.G.Narasimhan

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Muruganraja Government Advocate

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent to transfer Patta No.2207 on the file of the 2^nd respondent in

¶17

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.964 of 2023

¶19

favour of the petitioner and other legal heirs of her late husband namely Aranganathan in pursuance of petitioner's representation dated 28.11.2022.

¶20

In respect of property at Survey No.247/2A situated at

¶21

Chinnasalem Village, Kallakurichi District, it is the claim of the petitioner that the property originally stood in the name of the petitioner's husband one Aranganathan who died on 19.02.2022, therefore the petitioner and other legal heirs had made an application on 28.11.2022 to transfer and issue the patta in the name of the legal heirs including the petitioner. To consider the

¶22

said representation, the present writ petition has been moved.

¶23

Heard Mr.A.G.Narasimhan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.P.Muruganraja, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶24

The learned Government Advocate would submit that, the said representation submitted by the petitioner would be considered and necessary orders would be passed on merits within a time frame.

¶25

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.No.964 of 2023

¶27

Considering the said submission made by the learned Government

¶28

Advocate appearing for the respondents and having regard to the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ petition with the following orders:

¶29

There shall be a direction to the respondents to consider

¶30

the representation of the petitioner dated 28.11.2022 and pass orders thereon on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶31

With this direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶32

19.01.2023

¶33

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Sgl

¶34

¶35

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi. 2.The Tahsildar, Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.964 of 2023

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

Sgl

W.P.No.964 of 2023

19.01.2023

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Madhumathi v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhumathi v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Rajendran Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

L.Seshamani Vs the Tahsildar

N.Devaraj Vs The Thasildar

R.Ravi Vs The Tahsildar

M.Chandra Vs Inspector General of Registration

K.Ponnusamy Vs The Inspector General of Registration